You're wrong again. He hasn't published all of the questions, just 8 of them (unless I can't see the rest of them) which according to what other people are saying is just 1/3rd. When it comes to reading the article, yes, I've read it, and you're clearly implying that posting the video somewhat crossed the line and thus got him "sacked": "Seems this [posting the video] just went a wee bit over the line, as someone at Saatchi suddenly discovered that Dan has broken the rules". Unless I don't understand what you're trying to say in that sentence - if that's the case, I do apologise.