Pepsi/iTunes adspoof out.
We kinda knew it wouldn't take too long before someone spoofed that Pepsi/iTunes ad... And voila, here's the first spoof already.
A political parody produced by IDC Films and created by James E. Saldana, is already spreading like wildfire. Check the above linked site for mirrors of the film - we're one of them. Instead of Pepsi, the ad promotes the website called whatacrappypresent.com, a feature site from Downhillbattle.org.
Hat tip to Claymore for spotting it, now click 'read more' to see the film.
Or, watch the Big Shiny 6.4 Megabyte Quicktime movie
Pepsi
Please donate to keep adland alive. The Super Bowl Collection is the worlds one and only. It costs a minor fortune to keep up. If you love our efforts, please donate to keep the archive alive. You may also sponsor us with a large banner, advertise yourself as you help save our common advertising history.
Want to join adland?
Create an adgrunt account for 6 USD.
comments
- Drinspiration made by Absoult
4 hours 56 min ago - I was thinking to myself:
5 hours 31 min ago - What can be said in this
8 hours 49 min ago - Wow thats cool they are
10 hours 13 sec ago - There are so many companies
14 hours 55 min ago - The components included in a
15 hours 34 min ago - The components included in a
15 hours 35 min ago - Hilarious
1 day 12 hours ago - What is the name of the music
2 days 1 hour ago - צור קשר עם קוקה קולה ישראל
3 days 7 hours ago


Brill!
*hums* "we're not gonna take it..."
the delish irony is of course that the youngsters in the ad are shilling Pepsi to pay the RIAA and courtcosts.
Just wanted to add that downloading music without paying, is copyright infringement, so yeah you're liable to be sued.
another spoof, a double 1984-itunes whammy.
FUD = Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt
Groklaw.net notes that even one of the judges dealing with the RIAA asks them to tone down the language.
There is a huge bunch of comments and plenty of links at Groklaw for those interested.
... What happened to the good old fashioned word "bootlegging", to describe the action of copying films etc, and then selling bootleg videos and concert recordings? Or does that still get to be called that? I thought these days it was "DVD-pirating" etc.
Regardless, I can't equate the act of downloading a minute or few of music to the same level of bootlegging or piracy that major open-air markets display, where thousands of pirated DVDs and full Cd's are on sale for cheap. It perplexes me that the RIAA doesn't go after those guys first, and instead attacks youngsters who in all likelihood use the networks like I do, to recommend music to your friends, and to 'give it a listen' to see if you can be bothered buying the CD. The quality of the mp3's are not as good as any storebought CD - unfortunately for the RIAA, they produce a lot of crap Cd's, with one good pop-tart single, and the rest is droned repeating. Also, the invention of the CD that was literally forced upon us, effectively killed the single - talk about shooting themselves in the foot. When they can't make their business make sense, they call lawyers instead of figuring out what they can do to un-alienate the consumers they have been pissing off for years. I'd love to be their market strategy adviser - we wouldn't have been in this hellhole.
Post new comment