Is it advertising or is it graffiti?
Reuters reports: In the neat-nick city of Singapore a controversy over Nike ads is brewing. Apparently about 50 people compained that the bus stops suffered "acts of vandalism" or "graffiti". Little did they realize that the graffiti was posters put there on purpose.
The ads, featuring U.S. basketball star LeBron James, were posted over other ads- causing folks to think they were indeed graffiti.
Graffiti is a sensitive subject in the wealthy island known for obsessive civic orderliness. Its authorities famously caned American teenager Michael Fay in 1994 on charges of spray-paint vandalism in a case that shocked the West.
"We had a good laugh when we received this feedback," Henry Goh, a sales director at outdoor bus advertising firm Clear Channel, told the Straits Times newspaper.
* note - the image is from the kung fu master LeBron ad which was banned in China.
Please donate to keep adland alive. The Super Bowl Collection is the worlds one and only. It costs a minor fortune to keep up. If you love our efforts, please donate to keep the archive alive. You may also sponsor us with a large banner, advertise yourself as you help save our common advertising history.
Want to join adland?
Create an adgrunt account for 6 USD.
comments
- Funny thing about websites,
10 min ago - That was really dumb
1 hour 6 min ago - Subtle, guys. t(-_-t)
2 hours 25 min ago - I take yours and raise you
2 hours 56 min ago - ... They should have a
3 hours 31 min ago - No idea mate, a bit of a
4 hours 16 min ago - Me neither. But you know.
4 hours 17 min ago - So spending a little dosh on
4 hours 20 min ago - I see what is happening. I
4 hours 35 min ago - WTF?! This was INSANE!! MAKE
4 hours 40 min ago


Not only Singapore, but even Oslo is discussing graffiti in marketing:
all part of guerilla activities around www.501anti-fit.no
Oh yeah, have a loook here at Researcher.se he's found an image of the Singaporian Nike graffitti ads and it looks a right mess.
from here:
Post new comment