AdOfDaMonth tests your ad knowledge
Here's a new campaign for adofdamonth.com, created by Dalbir Singh from Ogilvy & Mather Budapest. See campaign inside.
... I get the rationale, I'm just thinking that it's rather sad that we can't identify these ads as belonging to a specific brand right off the bat, unless we've seen the ads before and are ad-nerds. Isn't that the idea of advertising, to be instantly recognizable to sell one brand? This campaign is telling me most award winners are pretty shit.
Advertised brand: www.AdOfDaMonth.com
Advert title(s): Playbox, Siat, Samose
Advertising Agency: Ogilvy & Mather Budapest
Creative Director: Dalbir Singh
Short rationale: The ads are testing the knowledge of
the creatives. How much are you innit?
Please donate to keep adland alive. The Super Bowl Collection is the worlds one and only. It costs a minor fortune to keep up. If you love our efforts, please donate to keep the archive alive. You may also sponsor us with a large banner, advertise yourself as you help save our common advertising history.
Want to join adland?
Create an adgrunt account for 6 USD.
comments
- Oh! Amazing vocation with the
1 hour 36 min ago - Oh! Amazing exertion through
5 hours 22 min ago - If truth be told prosperous
6 hours 19 min ago - Hilarious
12 hours 26 min ago - Considerably, this post is
17 hours 20 min ago - The modern development of the
19 hours 27 min ago - What is the name of the music
1 day 1 hour ago - צור קשר עם קוקה קולה ישראל
2 days 7 hours ago - אני רוצה ששמי יהיה על בקבוק
2 days 13 hours ago - Name Asaad
Coca cola
Thankz
2 days 13 hours ago


It's because it's just an image with a logo slapped on. There's no "brand idea" or whatever.
What's sad is that ads like that win awards and adofdamonth accolade and whatevers.
too true purken.
The likeness of Bozo The Clown in a mushroom cloud. Uh huh. Okay.
Ha! Didn't actually register the clown face until you said that. Must have been too subliminal for me, or else I just wasn't paying close attention.
More generally, what's the point behind it all? I went to the AdOfDaMonth site and couldn't make sense of it.
Are these real ads that we're supposed to remember? Or are they random mixtures of image+logo, and we're supposed to decide which brand makes more sense with the image?
I'm with you on this one, RLDavies. I don't understand the point at all.
I guess I might understand the Marilyn Manson image (Samsung, Bose) if I really try, but I don't get what Bozo The Clown has to do with video games, or Atomic weapons for that matter.
I get it. Mushroom clouds are fun. I think you need to be a gamer (or retired ditto) to understand the mindset, but hell if they didn't capture it perfectly with that image.
However branding it,well that's pretty weak in said example. Could be either brand when you don't know which one is the sender.
My brain hurts.
*headshot*! Moahahahaaa!
I never really liked that game. :P
Post new comment