I believe it's Laguna del Inca in the Valparaiso Region of Chile at the foot of the Andes. The entire spot was shot in Chile: Santiago and the surrounding areas. Despite the "don't try this," legal line insulting our intelligence, there was obviously some VFX work done to some of the locations. But a lot of that area is already stunning, so I'm sure it didn't need much.
The article isn't bashing the way he speaks.
The article is bashing the copywriter who wrote the dialogue which turned the kid into a shill. There is zero reason to these types of phrases in every day conversation. There are used car salesmen who sound less pushy and believable. It should be more than obvious that's what the article is referring to.
Why would it? And more importantly, why would brands engage at all? They're a content farm that constantly recycle the same listicles over and over again. And when they do it in "partnership," with a brand it's usually even more mediocre and phoned in. Not sure why anyone would waste spending their ad dollars with them at this point in time.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser
What are the chances malware will be clicked on as well?
- reply
Permalink