AXE - Find Your Magic - (2016) :60 (USA)

It's 2016, and that stuff you spray under your stinky armpits to make them less stinky is getting a rebrand.

In this ad - which Marketing Week writes repositions AXE in a "forth wave feminist world" - opens with a bold and counter-intuitive statement...

C'mon... a six pack... who needs a six pack?

We're then shown short and punchy vignettes, espousing the virtues of men who aren't living their lives according to traditional models of hyper-masculinity. Rather than dwelling on any one character or situation, we're hit with a barrage of them before we have any chance to digest, dwell or think. It's modern advertising for the ADHD generation.

There's the kid in the prohibition gangster suit, the annoying gym tosser, the preening narcisist (a ginger metrosexual De Niro from Taxi Driver about to take a selfie and put it on Instagram), the black dude dancing in heels and technicolor dream coat, prom king spinning in a wheelchair... it goes on.

But here's the thing - we're being presented with a dichotomy here, and a conflict of interest. The ad says “Hey guys, guess what - you don’t need to care about (conventional) looks!” but all of the executions show us what precisely? Looks. Not personality, or any real quality that matters. We're shown a series of attractive, young, in-shape men who represent yet more figures for the modern man to aspire to be like. But now it's not good enough to just have a six-pack. No, this time around, you've got to be effortlessly cool, like a character from Skins.

There's no self-assurance here either. If you want to tell a story, then tell a story about one of these people, not a clip show. We don't do that, because of the superficial nature of these clips, they tell us nothing, and make vacuous de jour statement of progressiveness, like hollow echoes in a empty cave.

The only really good part of this ad is that it features a gay couple, which for some strange reason no other critic has even noticed. Watch 0:26-0:30 - Two guys making shy sexy eyes over "The Power of the Banana" vinyl; the banana being a well known penis metaphor. What's their story? I want to know. But we'll never find out, because apparently in 2016 we're still getting clip shows that give lip service to showing us something new while treading roads we passed decades ago.

An interracial couple. A disabled guy. A gay couple. So what? I could see all that and more in Camden Town on a Thursday afternoon. Say something meaningful.

Men don't need to be told to 'Find their magic', and they certainly don't need this kind of patronizing waffle.

The real question is will millennials take to this type of superficial self-empowerment advertising, targeted at men? Maybe 10 years ago they might. But young people trust brands less than ever now.

Case in point from Cameron Jonsson, CEO of Reach + Acquire:

Research is a primary driver of Millennial sales - 93% report reading product reviews before purchasing. Faith in community input is strong, and brands are shrinking in importance: 62% of 18-34 year olds trust brands less than people.

In a time when the special snowflake generation just got 21 new genders overnight on Facebook, is celebrating uniqueness in a grooming product not the most obvious inclusive strategy they can do? No doubt. But let's celebrate real quirks in real people, and not pander to our audience. Millennials are too smart for this, and they deserve better.

72andSunny Amsterdam

Adland® is supported by your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi coffee.
Anonymous Adgrunt's picture
Files must be less than 1 MB.
Allowed file types: jpg jpeg gif png wav avi mpeg mpg mov rm flv wmv 3gp mp4 m4v.
Dabitch's picture

I fully understand why this strategy was dusted off from the last 80s when we saw it in Reebok lets U.B.U, selling things on individuals uniqueness is a shortcut to the consumers heart. For remember - they're all individuals.... -"I'm not". This is grooming stuff, clearly we don't all look alike, and the base selling point of all grooming stuff is bettering what you got.

I have no beef with that. I guess I'm just a little surprised at the execution feeling so dated, especially when it's coming from Amsterdam in the heart of happening Europe and not the we-get-all-our-fashion-a-year-later-Los Angeles office. Macklemore's "Thrift shop" was in 2012, where that guy in the suit & hat belongs. The ball culture heel dance cat walking mainstreamed when Madonna released Vogue and I was in college! (And as I recall she got a lot of hate for 'stealing' a culture that belonged to an often poor African-american and latino gay community, instead of kudos for breaking down the barriers that kept them out of the mainstream - there is literally nothing new under the sun). I suppose it's due for another revival, like when everyone was into Swing dancing in the late 90s (though lets never speak of that again). Even the dancing on treadmill guy has already appeared in many ads, most recently for Indeed job hunt when a Physiologist lets it rip. My point is, for something that is clearly aiming to be "you be you" fashionable, it's dated like a mall in suburbia and fails to hit the mark of real individuals who do their own thing, because those people wouldn't be caught dead in a mall.

For the record I had the same issue with the punks in the U.B.U campaign. Like punks would wear Reebok. Puh-lease.

Dabitch's picture

Oh yes, as expected. They should have left the ball culture alone. Tumblr didn't like it. I told you, there's nothing new under the sun. (Open image in new window if it's too small to read)