I built this website. From scratch. Including the servers.
hahahaha, over at Snarkhunting GaryVision suggests that they got the name from this intersection near the GAP headquarters. I think Gary is right.
Hear hear.
I don't understand this fear of fragmentation. I long for the day when I don't get stupid media in my briefs such as "Target: Sk8-kids Media: Double Page Spread in Conservative newspaper". I've seriously gotten briefs that read like that. I spent lots of time figuring out where the target was so I could reach them there as part of the creative process, media-buy should be part of it, and media buyer should be a creative job. Now, there's less wheelin' and dealin' for discount prices when bulk-buying but nobody wanted those four o'clock in the morning cable-channel spot-slots anyway. Media is not a bulk commodity, for great campaigns it never was, perhaps this 'fragmentation' will finally make people realize this. Media buying shouldn't be willy nilly, but well thought out as part of the entire creative strategy.
Ah yes, brilliant - that looks like it's the place. CreativeIreland, ta! creaghfish says;
As one of the team responsible I feel oblidged to defend the 'originality' of the idea.
The brief: Talk directly to young music lovers who have a wide taste in music about the Summer of
music sponsored by Heineken.
Our answer: People who are into cars - petrol heads. People who are into music - speaker heads.
It was an honest attempt at originality (we still think it is) although it's now been shown to have existed in a different context at a different time.
We were unaware of the existence of 'speakerboy' at the concept origination stage, so believe us when we say that it is an unfortunate coincidence rather than a blatant rip-off.
Plywood, quoting some of an article is fine. Linking to an article is great as well. Copy and pasting the whole article from the Globe and Mail isn't kosher at all, so I had to edit away much of that. Sorry mate, ta. If anyone else wants to read it again, it is this article at the globe and mail. There ya go.
As deep.ed and others have pointed out, the organization that reported this ice-cream name as racist - Centre against Racism - aren't exactly doing any good and this storm might have been a desperate attempt for them to pretend like they were actually doing something to prevent racism.
In the newspapers today there's a story about this useless org here at SVD headlines: Fight against racism expensive fiasco where they outline how the centre spends their 8,3 million SKR on office-space, hotels, travels, and restaurant dinners but have failed to do any research or reports about about racism.
Ther are no concrete ideas about what one wants to do, says a former board member. We made key rings and erasers [with our logo], but nothing more substantial. We couldn't spend all our money because we really didn't have any activities against racism.
The article writer also points out: ""I år har CMR satsat stort på en kampanj mot lakritsglassen Nogger Black, en insats som har kritiserats mycket." - "This year Centre Against Racism have worked hard on a campaign against the ice-cream Nogger Black, which has been highly criticized."
Benito Miguel at the Immigration Institute was part of the group that created Centre Against Racism. These days he's very critical:
- "The Centre Against Racism have basically not done anything at all. The campaign against Nogger Black was only to hide their non-working."
There are currently 2 users online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser
