I built this website. From scratch. Including the servers.
Like I just said in a comment under another "They / Them" ad, the New York times says this line/strategy is what pushed Trump up among the surbuban white women that Kamala also was trying target. I'll quote :
But the ad, with its vivid tagline — “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you” — broke through in Mr. Trump’s testing to an extent that stunned some of his aides.
So they poured still more money into the ads, running them during football games, which prompted Charlamagne Tha God, the host of the Breakfast Club, a popular show among Black listeners, to express exasperation — and his on-air complaints gave the Trump team fodder for yet another commercial. The Charlamagne ad ranked as one of the Trump team’s most effective 30-second spots, according to an analysis by Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s leading super PAC. It shifted the race 2.7 percentage points in Mr. Trump’s favor after viewers watched it.
The anti-trans ads cut to the core of the Trump argument: that Ms. Harris was “dangerously liberal” — the exact vulnerability her team was most worried about. The ads were effective with Black and Latino men, according to the Trump team, but also with moderate suburban white women who might be concerned about transgender athletes in girls’ sports.
Those were the same suburban women Ms. Harris was trying to mobilize with ads about abortion.
Democrats struggled to respond. At one point, former President Bill Clinton told an associate, “We have to answer it and say we won’t do it.” He even raised the issue in a conversation with the campaign and was told the Trump ads were not necessarily having an impact, according to two people familiar with his conversations. He never broached the topic publicly.
The Harris team debated internally how to respond. Ads the Harris team produced with a direct response to the “they/them” ads wound up faring poorly in internal tests. The ads never ran.
Today, Aftonbladet (a Swedish tabloid) say that this was the film "that took Trump to a big win. They refer to this New York times article which I'll quote from:
Trump’s gamble on anti-trans ads
About a week after the September debate, Mr. Trump started spending heavily on a television ad that hammered Ms. Harris for her position on a seemingly obscure topic: the use of taxpayer funds to fund surgeries for transgender inmates. “Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access,” Ms. Harris said in a 2019 clip used in the ad.
It was a big bet: Mr. Trump was leading on the two most salient issues in the race — the economy and immigration — yet here he was, intentionally changing the subject.
But the ad, with its vivid tagline — “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you” — broke through in Mr. Trump’s testing to an extent that stunned some of his aides.
So they poured still more money into the ads, running them during football games, which prompted Charlamagne Tha God, the host of the Breakfast Club, a popular show among Black listeners, to express exasperation — and his on-air complaints gave the Trump team fodder for yet another commercial. The Charlamagne ad ranked as one of the Trump team’s most effective 30-second spots, according to an analysis by Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s leading super PAC. It shifted the race 2.7 percentage points in Mr. Trump’s favor after viewers watched it.
The anti-trans ads cut to the core of the Trump argument: that Ms. Harris was “dangerously liberal” — the exact vulnerability her team was most worried about. The ads were effective with Black and Latino men, according to the Trump team, but also with moderate suburban white women who might be concerned about transgender athletes in girls’ sports.
Those were the same suburban women Ms. Harris was trying to mobilize with ads about abortion.
Democrats struggled to respond. At one point, former President Bill Clinton told an associate, “We have to answer it and say we won’t do it.” He even raised the issue in a conversation with the campaign and was told the Trump ads were not necessarily having an impact, according to two people familiar with his conversations. He never broached the topic publicly.
The Harris team debated internally how to respond. Ads the Harris team produced with a direct response to the “they/them” ads wound up faring poorly in internal tests. The ads never ran.
According to the in-depth analyses carried out by Professor Young, Imane Khelif lacks a uterus but has testicles in the abdomen and a micropenis. Hormone tests revealed a testosterone level of 14.7, whereas the female gender does not exceed the maximum level of 3. Finally, Khelif’s karyotype was male, type XY—in short, a biological male, who therefore unfairly competed at the Paris Olympic Games in the female category.
The scandal is not so much that of the true identity of Imane Khelif, who clearly suffers from a disabling pathology, as that of the lie surrounding this person and the responsibility of the Olympic Committee for having accepted the athlete as eligible for the women’s category. According to Le Correspondant‘s investigation, Imane Khelif sent the required medical file in person to the Olympic Committee, which was therefore able to examine it in detail—except that it has been proven that the Olympic Committee does not base its decisions on medical data.
Khelif’s selection, which was made in record time, was the result of a game of relationships and influences between the Algerian Olympic Committee and the International Olympic Committee. One IOC member, a certain Mustapha Berraf, openly supported Khelif’s candidacy “out of patriotism”—regardless of the athlete’s true sex.
And that’s not all. Medical records reveal Imane Khelif’s profoundly unstable and potentially dangerous condition. The athlete is subjected to hormone treatments which result in a state of chronic depression and latent violence. One of his opponents in the ring, Italian Angela Carini, paid the price during the Olympic Games.
Algerian media outlet The Algerian Post was quick to retaliate, describing the author of the investigation as a “pseudo-journalist” and accusing him of being relayed “by pro-Trump and far-right French accounts.” The outlet accused Djaffer Ait Aoudia of calling Imane Khelif “a transgender,” which would be impossible since Algeria prohibits gender transition, twisting the facts since the journalist only highlighted Khelif’s pathology without considering him to be a transgender person—which he is not.
There is currently 1 user online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser
