Ack! SPEC...totally spec. What complete bullshit and an utter contempt for the professional photography world. They actually write that most spec is about design when, in fact, photographers are asked to do spec work every day, just like designers. Hell, just look at their other publication--should be called Spec Quaterly.
Shame on them. I'll definitely be warning my readers to stay away from that site.
Don't get me started on rights and rules in photography. Here in the US, especially, there has been a serious problem with willful ignorance of the golden rule. If someone ripped of an ad Host (the agency) made, think they wouldn't sue?Respect by and for creatives, across discipline and within, really needs a boost, I think. Then issues like this wouldn't come up--pros would work with pros instead of trying to do everything as cheaply as possible.
I like the idea of showing more and more "real" women in ads. I do wish, in this case, they had shot them better. It's just not a very good image and that takes away from the positive statement. One thing Dove got very right was the production values in its photography.
Is it just me, or does that make anyone else think of the Mary Typler Moore Show? Now since that was a CBS show (damn I know some obscure crap) I suppose that might work somehow, but for me I think it is more in the way of saying "We're relying on old crap to get you interested--as represented by our logo that looks so 1970--don't expect anything new or fresh from us."
There is currently 1 user online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser
This news has started hitting the pro photog forums...they are NOT happy campers. Woo hoo!
- reply
Permalink