Err.... the part you have trouble with is a direct quote from the article - that's why it's in a blockquote, along with an attribution and link to the source.
Your comments are welcome and appreciated as they added lots of info to the scenario that we previously didn't have, but your problem is with the Globe and Mail.
Thanks for the rundown. Cheers.
Interesting scripted line from this spot - "And I have to say it's nice that there's a low risk of sexual side effects."
Err... "nice" would be no risk.
That's like saying "I'm pleased that there's only a 49% chance that my genitals will grow tentacles and terrorize the countryside."
I believe your wife has afflicted herself with a pesky condition known in the ad trade as "overthinking." I'm not a fan of the term, but it certainly seems to apply here.
"What are you doing?" would be a most sensible question to ask a stranger who sits down at your table and starts eating your husband's steak while he's away.
And while you might not find A-1 at Ruth's Chris Steak House, it is available at many of your finer eatin' joints. I personally prefer Lea and Perrin's, Maker's Mark or even 57 Sauce to A-1, but A-1 is dug by many a man - even if it's on an $60 cut o' beef. For your common Joe, familiarity brings satisfaction.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser