I built this website. From scratch. Including the servers.
The argument that citizens (individuals) financially helping other citizens afford lawsuits can bring a "chilling effect" on news reporting and is an attack on the first amendment is delusional to me. First off, judges throw frivolous lawsuits out of court before cases are even heard, be they buddy-sponsored by a billionaire or not. The system is designed to take care of that. What difference does it make if it was Hulk, his fans, his insurance company, or a billionaire benefactor that helped him finance the case that he won? None. Gawker had legal insurance and deep pockets, the playing field was just evened out. It's funny to me how people are upset a billionaire is sponsoring cases, instead of being upset that one needs millions to take a case to court.
Second, confusing free speech and the right to privacy like this is ridiculous. Invading peoples bedrooms for sex tapes is not the hill journalism should die on. Though some Editors, like Nate Silver from FiveThirtyEight seem to think they should. The irony that this is posted on Facebook does not escape me.
Yes indeed, see the update Peter Theil reveals that he did indeed finance the Hulk vs Gawker case where we're trying to collect media tweet reactions in the comments.
Comment from MSNBC host Chris Hayes.
A billionaire secretly suing a publication into oblivion is a million times bigger threat to free speech than 'safe spaces'
— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) May 25, 2016
Pearl clutching (or salt) starts here at Wired: HOW CAN WE MAKE YOU HAPPY TODAY, PETER THIEL?
Did you know Peter Thiel is so great that Chaka Khan once sang an entire song about Peter Thiel? This happened at Jeff Bezos’ 50th birthday party, which took place in space. The party’s theme was “Omniscience,” and the dress code was “Plutocracy Casual.” Anyway, Chaka Khan—a great singer, though surely not as good a singer as Peter Thiel!—sang a version of her 1984 hit “I Feel For You,” and then changed the lyrics to “I Thiel for you.” Peter Thiel loved it so much, he didn’t secretly bankroll a lawsuit against Chaka Khan, nor did he secretly bankroll a lawsuit against Prince, who wrote the original “I Feel For You.”
In fact, he didn’t secretly sue anyone that day!
That's in WIRED, people.
Hulk Hogan's attorneys asked Judge Campbell for a permanent injunction against re-posting the now infamous sex tape ever again, while Gawkers's attorneys responded stating ".. don't think there's a threat we're going to repost this." Gawker attorney Seth Berlin asked judge to let them seek discovery regarding Peter Thiel's alleged funding of this suit. "We would like to get to the bottom of this" said Seth Berlin. Judge Campbell refused to even look at (gossipy) news reports about it stating: "I don't like looking at all the stuff that’s published out there. It’s not healthy."
There are currently 4 users online.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser