Taylor Swift joins growing army of musicians leaving Spotify

Hey did you hear the news? Taylor Swift has pulled her music from Spotify. First let's read Spotify's sugary sweet blog post lamenting the fact.

We love Taylor Swift, and our more than 40 million users love her even more – nearly 16 million of them have played her songs in the last 30 days, and she’s on over 19 million playlists.
We hope she’ll change her mind and join us in building a new music economy that works for everyone. We believe fans should be able to listen to music wherever and whenever they want, and that artists have an absolute right to be paid for their work and protected from piracy. That’s why we pay nearly 70% of our revenue back to the music community.
PS – Taylor, we were both young when we first saw you, but now there’s more than 40 million of us who want you to stay, stay, stay. It’s a love story, baby, just say, Yes.

If you read between the lines it's "Holy shit you are costing us a lot of money, wtf." More than 40 million people want you to stay, stay, stay. But those 40 million people ain't paying the bills, with your paltry royalty rates, baby. When it comes to making a sustainable living through royalties, The math doesn't add up. It's why Thom Yorke pulled his solo music complaining "new artists get paid fuck all with this model." It's also why The Black Keys haven't put their two most recent albums up on Spotify either.
So why is Swift doing this? Simple--because she can. And she's one of the only artists out there who can. According to The Verge:

Swift and her label are in the extremely uncommon position of having the power to pull this off and likely benefit from it. As of November 1st, 1989 was on track to have the biggest first-week album sales since 2002 and set a new record for first-week sales by a female artist (Britney Spears' Oops!… I Did It Again holds the record, set in 2000), according to Billboard. Breaking those records would require 1989 to sell 1.3 million copies before today, which it was forecasted to do. Billboard says that the sales figures won't be released until November 5th, but the existing numbers make it clear that Swift is dominating stores right now.

Taylor Swift has already voiced her thoughts on this in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, so it shouldn't come as such a surprise.
Either way, It's really simple to understand. If you put your catalog on a streaming service where people have the free option, people will take the free option, and your albums will not sell. Get it? Taylor Swift is flipping the bird at Spotify. Considering Spotify's royalty rates are between $0.006 and $0.0084 per play let's hope more bands follow Taylor Swift's lead.

Adland® is supported by your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi coffee.
Anonymous Adgrunt's picture
comment_node_story
Files must be less than 5 MB.
Allowed file types: jpg jpeg gif png wav avi mpeg mpg mov rm flv wmv 3gp mp4 m4v.
kidsleepy's picture

Other artists who have either haven't put their music on Spotify, have put some but not all of their music on Spotify, or have never put their music on Spotify are:

Beyoncé (latest album not on there)

The Beatles, Garth Brooks, Bob Seger, and AC/DC (never had music on there)

Don't forget, too when Vulfpeck tried to up their income by releasing a "silent album," which could be played all night long to generate the income necessary to mount a tour (in and of itself a sad commentary on the industry) Spotify made sure to put an end to those shenanigans and even judged the music as being derivative of John Cage. Yeah because there's no derivative music on Spotify at all, right?

Dabitch's picture

It's really interesting that Spotify launched, and was used by practically everyone in Sweden for what seems like years before suddenly musicians pulled out. The first "vanishing" of music from playlists happened when Spotify went pay in Sweden alone. Why?

Well, rumour has it that while they were working out of offices on Jakobsbergsgatan, they simply downloaded all of their music via The Pirate Bay, so that they'd have some music to build the app around. While this makes sense, the rumour also says that they kept the un-authorized music on for far longer than just the demo-era. Like, until May 2011.

mind you, it's just a really persistent rumour.

David Felton's picture

They should have know she'd be trouble when she walked in.

(shame on me for this comment)