I built this website. From scratch. Including the servers.
International adgrunts take note:
ALL SUBMITTED ENTRIES MUST BE LICENSED PURSUANT TO THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE DESIGNATED FOR THIS PROMOTION. MUST BE A U. S. CITIZEN OR U. S. RESIDENT ALIEN AND OVER 15 YEARS OLD TO ENTER.
bugger, so I can't play. ;) dang!
Tigger commented on adlist:
>From the article :
"The sheer frequency of running a commercial, no matter how annoying or 'bad' it may be, can really help to get a brand name into the consumer's head," says David Blum, executive vice president of Eisner Communications here in Baltimore.
He also added. No I haven't read any research or new thinking on this topic since 1972.
It's OVER. This myth has been debunked. It is an ex-strategy. It has ceased to be. There are countless volumes of research to prove that it is not a good idea to run advertising that people hate. A couple of badly misinterpreted P&G case studies from the seventies are no longer the basis of modern advertising thinking.
If people in this industry continue to refuse to avail themselves of the relevant information instead of just parroting stuff they read or hear in meetings we are doomed.
--tigger
and apologies for the rantagonistic tone (and yes I did just make that word up)
Check this out - gamespot gossips: As part of a new contest called the "Hot Mario! Campaign," Nintendo will be giving out 3,000 additional Famicom-themed Game Boy Advance SPs.
Nintendo will also hand out 1,000 second prizes, a Mario Hat identical to the one seen in a recent Japanese TV commercial...
I know I want one of them hats.
Adland® is a commercial-laden heaven and hell for advertising addicts around the world.
This advertising publication was founded in 1996, built on beer and bravery, Adland® now boasts the largest super bowl commercials collection in the world.
Adland® survives on your donations alone. You can help us out by buying us a Ko-Fi. Adland® works best in Brave browser