@no_thanks1234: Rosy Nola, Tessa Lena, and Chelsea Crowell showed better adskills with what they did, than the current campaign. They created shareable social media posts in a time when the topic of sexual harassment is piping hot, using timing and connections to get the word out. There's now been more press about Boxer leaving the C3 than there was about the campaign. It may seem to outsiders as if the C3 is an organisation made up of assholes and big egos - and your comment here rather cements this branding. This is obviously a PR nightmare for a group that only wanted to good. So it's only natural that you'd try and deflect from the issue at hand, by being irritated with my review of the campaign on Adland.

Now as for the ads. Either you don't understand that copying a concept (even when you call it a parody) is a hack thing to do, much like when creating soundalikes of music, or you simply don't value creative ideas outside of your skillset. Neither one of these things is a good look for C3 as they claim to be fighting for creators rights. According to Billboard, the campaign was part of "a significant ad buy" on Youtube which strikes me as really ironic. You actually used your fundraised money to pay the piper who steals your livelihood?